Home / Compare

Best I Ching Online Tools Compared (2026)

Four I Ching sites, compared on the facts you can check: where the translation comes from, how moving lines are handled, whether an AI writes the interpretation, and what stands between you and a cast. Every claim on this page is dated. Nothing here is a slogan.

TL;DR
  • ichingonline.net: the senior site of the group, roughly two decades old, donation-funded. Pick it for depth and history.
  • castiching.com: the minimal tool. Cast, see your moving lines, no account, no AI. Pick it for speed.
  • aiching.app: the name promises AI, the public site shows none behind it. Email sign-up first. Pick it with eyes open.
  • The Hexagrams: the newcomer and ours. Legge 1899 public domain text, moving lines visualized, real AI analysis, no sign-up.
  • Ready to cast your first hexagram? It takes two minutes, and the first reading is free.

The Four Sites at a Glance

4 sitesverified Sep 21, 2026
Dimensionichingonline.netcastiching.comaiching.appThe Hexagrams
Translation sourceWilhelm 1924Wilhelm / BaynesOriginal text plus hexagram libraryLegge 1899, public domain, plus modern rewrite
Moving linesYes, with transformed hexagramYes, marked on the castSix-step line-by-line revealYes, highlighted, changed hexagram shown
AI analysisNoNo, the site says no AINo evidence of AI featuresYes, real AI deep reading
MonetizationDonationsBuy Me a CoffeeEmail sign-up, paid laterFree cast, deep reading $4.99
Sign-up requiredNoNoYes, email before castingNo
DesignDated, late-1990s webSimple and readableCleanDark purple and amber, ritual feel
Traffic, top regionUS 79.9% †US 59.9% †Spain 43.6% ‡Global, new site

† Third-party traffic estimate. ‡ Figure from third-party data, not re-verified at publish; marked as pending until the next quarterly check. Facts current as of September 21, 2026, re-checked quarterly.

ichingonline.net

senior sitedonation-funded

ichingonline.net is the senior site of the group, running for roughly two decades. It covers all sixty-four hexagrams, with a reading for every line and a transformed hexagram when moving lines appear, and the whole thing works without an account. The site asks only for a donation if it has served you well. The design is dated, close to the late-1990s web, and the pages are dense, but the coverage is thorough and unhurried. Facts verified from the public site, September 21, 2026.

castiching.com

minimalno AI, by its own words

castiching.com is a focused casting tool. You toss coins on the page, the hexagram builds line by line, moving lines are marked, and the text for each appears beneath. The site says plainly that it does not use AI to interpret results. There is no sign-up, and the only money involved is an optional Buy Me a Coffee button. The design is simple and readable, built around one job: getting you from question to hexagram without friction. Facts verified from the public site, September 21, 2026.

aiching.app

email firstAI claim unverified

aiching.app presents itself as an AI-assisted I Ching app, but the public site shows no evidence of AI features behind the name, and we say so rather than guess. Readings are revealed in six steps, one per line. Casting starts with an email address, making this the only site of the four with a sign-up wall. The design is clean. Third-party traffic data points to Spain as its largest audience, a figure we have not re-verified and so mark as pending. Facts verified from the public site, September 21, 2026.

The Hexagrams

this sitefree cast, $4.99 deep reading

thehexagrams.com is this site, the newcomer in the group and the one we run, so we state the facts and let you judge. Casting is free with no sign-up, using the standard three-coin math. The text is James Legge's 1899 translation, public domain for over a century, rewritten into modern language. Moving lines are highlighted and the changed hexagram is shown. A deep reading adds AI analysis of your one question for $4.99. Facts verified from our public site, September 21, 2026.

Why We Made This Comparison

People keep asking which I Ching site to trust, so we built this page to answer with dates instead of opinions. The honest starting point is that all three other sites do real work. ichingonline.net has been running for roughly two decades, which outlasts almost every site in its category, and that run earns respect on its own. castiching.com does one thing and does it cleanly. aiching.app shows the least evidence on its public site, and we say that plainly, with room to be corrected.

Where the four part ways: how moving lines are handled, whether an AI writes the interpretation, and how much friction sits between you and a cast. Those are the choices that shaped this site. We visualize moving lines, we run a real AI analysis on the deep reading, and we ask for nothing before your first cast. Follow the money, too. Two sites live on donations, one on an email funnel, and ours on a single $4.99 deep reading.

On the translation we settled the question early. This site builds on James Legge's 1899 version, public domain for more than a century, and rewrites it in modern language. That keeps the classical text free to read in full, and it keeps our sources checkable. The other sites lean on the later Wilhelm and Baynes edition, which is a fine translation, but it is not the one we use or quote.

This page follows the standard we hold for casting: one question, one cast, one answer. We verified what we could, we dated it, and we will not re-run the comparison until it flatters us. The classics warned against exactly that habit. In the Judgment of Hexagram 4, Măng, as translated by James Legge in 1899:

When he shows (the sincerity that marks) the first recourse to divination, I instruct him. If he apply a second and third time, that is troublesome; and I do not instruct the troublesome.[1]

Read the full Judgment and its commentary on our Hexagram 4 page. If you want to see how the same standard applies to the first hexagram, the full Legge text of The Creative is onHexagram 1. Two related questions get fuller treatment in our guides: how tointerpret a hexagram in four steps, and when and how tocast, from timing to ritual.

FAQ

Is this comparison unbiased?
Not completely, and we disclose it up front: we operate The Hexagrams, and the last column is our own product. To keep the rest as fair as it can be, every claim about the other three sites was checked on their public pages on September 21, 2026, and that date is printed on this page so you can re-check us. The traffic figures are third-party estimates, marked with a dagger. If you find an error, write to us, and we will correct it and update the date.
Which of the four should I use?
It depends on what you want. ichingonline.net if you want the longest track record and the most complete coverage of the classic text. castiching.com if you want the fastest cast with nothing in the way. The Hexagrams if you want a plain-text translation plus an AI reading of your own question. aiching.app is worth a look, but weigh the evidence questions above before you hand over an email.
Why does the table say "no evidence of AI" on aiching.app?
Because that is the honest way to state it. We did not find AI features on the public site, and we will not claim we did, nor will we accuse the site of faking. If aiching.app adds visible AI features, the next quarterly review will update this page.
SOURCES & FURTHER READING
  1. Legge, James (trans.). The Yî King, Sacred Books of the East vol. XVI, 1899. Hexagram 4, Măng, the Judgment, quoted above on re-running a question.
  2. Comparison facts verified from the public sites ichingonline.net, castiching.com and aiching.app on September 21, 2026. Traffic percentages are third-party estimates and are flagged in the table.
  3. Our related guides: coin method versus yarrow stalks versus online casting, how to interpret a hexagram, casting timing and ritual. More in the blog index.
  4. Read the full Hexagram 4 in the Legge translation on this site: /hexagram/4/
Cast Your First Hexagram

You have the facts now, dated and checkable. The next step is not more comparing. It is one honest question, asked once.

Cast your first hexagram, free